Checking in with the Real World
Pat Townsend & Joan Gebhardt
ptownsend@qualitydigest.com
As those who have been reading
this column for the last few years know, one of the authors
(Pat) is the director of a quality process for an insurance
company that has grown from approximately 850 employees
to more than 1,100 since early 2000. Holding a job in the
“real world” was the result of his taking the
unusual step of moving from the speaker/author circuit to
the corporate world. The catalyst for the move was a challenging
question from his current employer: “You’ve
been telling people all over the world how to do this quality
stuff. Can you do it yourself?”
That was more than three years ago and the quality process—named
Quality First—is now just over two and a half years
old. And, it’s time for another periodic progress
report.
In brief, the process continues to thrive. In the two years
and eight months since the process was officially launched
the quality teams (this is a complete quality process so
every employee in the company is always on at least one
quality team) have implemented 2,643 quality ideas, Innovations,
improvements and corrections have had a total annualized
financial savings of $9,867,048 soft dollars and $6,287,184
hard dollars.
It’s appropriate to define soft dollars. Soft dollars
can be thought of as a measurement of an organization’s
capacity for work. At this company, saved time is valued
at $15 per hour across the board. If an hour of work is
eliminated, it’s worth $15, no matter what the hourly
wage of the person(s) involved. If, because of the implementation
of a quality idea, a clerk (or an executive) need no longer
perform a particular task that took two hours per week,
104 hours of effort have been saved on an annualized basis,
and that’s worth $1,560. Most important, there are
now 104 hours of work capacity available to do something
that actually needs to be done.
With this in mind, let’s take a second look at the
soft dollar savings to date. The total of $9,867,048 divided
by $15 means that there has been 657,803 hours of work—on
an annualized basis—eliminated. Assuming the average
person works 40 hours a week for 50 weeks a year, that means
that 328.9 person-years of work need no longer be done.
Without the Quality First process, in order to accomplish
everything that’s currently being done, the company
would have to hire 328.9 people in addition to the 1,100+
folks on the payroll.
Most encouraging is the fact that the numbers—quality
ideas implemented, dollars saved, time saved—have
all increased each year. How is this level of activity sustained?
There are two primary factors: having a solid system and
having unwavering support from the president of the company.
Put mildly, the company’s complete quality process
system was not a routine approach and was first implemented
at a time when Six Sigma (thanks in large part to highly
publicized GE successes) was the reigning fad. About a year
after this CQP process was initiated, Pat was given an article
about a quality process that had been put in motion at a
large insurance company under the guidance of a couple of
GE/Welch veterans. The process was praised in a nine-page
article in a leading insurance industry magazine.
Remembering the old days of the U.S. quality revolution
when anybody could share information about how to do this
quality stuff, Pat placed a call to the Welch disciple named
in the article as the director of the quality effort. He
never got past her secretary, who offered (at the direction
of the quality process director) to give him the name of
their consultant.
At that point, he compared the results-to-date of the Six
Sigma/Black Belt-driven process to the one he was helping
to direct and discovered that his process was at least three
and a half times as effective in terms of measurable results.
A year later, the other company filed for bankruptcy.
A solid process would, however, be of little use if the
head of the organization wasn’t personally and obviously
involved. The company president with whom Pat works says
that there are three components that define an organization
and its success: mission, quality and culture.
“Mission,” he says, “is what we want
to do; culture is who we are; and quality is how we do what
we do. We aren’t going to get anywhere if we don’t
pay attention to all three and do all three as well as possible.”
Over the last three-plus years, the Quality First process
has grown to embrace all activities in addition to the core
activities of defining and implementing quality ideas. These
activities (all of which affect the company culture) have
ranged from staging a one-hour musical production, to presenting
the strategic plan to employees, to defining and directing
ceremonies on holidays. As the process has grown and the
responsibilities of the quality department have expanded,
the department has grown from three members to four.
Quality isn’t nuclear science, and it’s here
to stay (ask any customer when she or he intends to stop
taking quality into consideration in making purchasing decisions,
and you will get, at best, a quizzical, “Are you nuts?”
look). With the right process and the strong support of
senior management, a quality process, which is both efficient
and effective, can be initiated within six to eight months
(elapsed between senior management’s approval and
the kick-off of the Quality First process: five months and
16 days).
It’s not easy but it’s frequently a great deal
of fun. And it’s profitable.
Pat Townsend and Joan Gebhardt have written more than
200 articles and six books, including Commit to Quality
(John Wiley & Sons, 1986); Quality in Action: 93
Lessons in Leadership, Participation, and Measurement (John
Wiley & Sons, 1992); Five-Star Leadership: The
Art and Strategy of Creating Leaders at Every Level (John
Wiley & Sons, 1997); Recognition, Gratitude &
Celebration (Crisp Publications, 1997); How Organizations
Learn: Investigate, Identify, Institutionalize (Crisp
Publications, 1999); and Quality Is Everybody's Business
(CRC Press, 1999). Pat Townsend has recently re-entered
the corporate world and is now dealing with “leadership.com”
issues as a practitioner as well as an observer, writer
and speaker. He is now chief quality officer for UICI, a
diverse financial services corporation headquartered in
the Dallas area. Letters to the editor regarding this column
can be sent to letters@qualitydigest.com.
|