![](/sites/default/files/editorial_images/sign1000.jpg)
Sure, the message is clear. But does your signage have the right tone? Photo by Adam Birkett on Unsplash
In the world of continuous improvement and lean management, clear and respectful communication is crucial.
ADVERTISEMENT |
Let’s take a moment to examine two different approaches to communicating a simple instruction regarding the operation of a centrifuge, as seen in the images below—pictures I took in a hospital laboratory where I was working 15 years ago or so.
On the left (below), we have a handwritten sign that I discovered one day that reads, “DO NOT CHANGE SPIN TIME. Should be 6 Min.” It’s a direct command that leaves little room for understanding or buy-in from the team. While the intent is clear, the tone can be perceived as authoritarian and dismissive, which might not resonate well with employees. This approach assumes that the instruction is enough without providing context or reasons.
One key lesson I’ve learned from Toyota people is that if you need to be directive, you should explain why. I’ve seen this approach work well in many settings. I coached the team I was working with to apply that concept to a better sign—and to not rely only on a sign for communication in a small team.
Now, let’s consider the sign on the right. This sign reads, “Centrifuges now need to be set for 6 MINUTES. Why? This is the required time for plasma tubes. Please do not set the timer back to 10 minutes or any other time.” This message is not only clearer but far more respectful and informative.
The sign should be either the starting point for a discussion within the team or a follow-up reminder of the discussion about keeping the setting where it is. Lesson: Don’t rely on signs alone, no matter how good the sign might be.
Why the right/new sign is better
Provides context and reasoning
The sign on the right explains why the centrifuge should be set for 6 minutes: It’s the required time for plasma tubes. This bit of information is crucial because it helps employees understand the purpose behind the instruction. When people know why they are being asked to do something, they are more likely to comply willingly and correctly.
Clear and specific instructions
Instead of a terse command, the sign on the right provides specific instructions about not setting the timer to 10 minutes or any other time. It anticipates possible mistakes and gently guides employees toward the correct action.
Respectful tone
The tone of the message on the right treats employees like adults who are capable of understanding and following instructions. It assumes that employees want to do the right thing and provides them with the information they need to succeed.
Encourages ownership and responsibility
By explaining the reasoning behind the required spin time, the sign on the right encourages employees to take ownership of their work. They understand that their actions have a direct effect on the quality of the results, fostering a sense of responsibility and accountability.
Treating employees with respect
One of the core principles of lean and continuous improvement is respect for people. This principle is reflected in how we communicate with our teams. Signs and instructions shouldn’t just tell people what to do but also educate and empower them. When employees feel respected and informed, they are more engaged and motivated.
Effective communication also involves anticipating questions and potential misunderstandings. The right-hand sign does this well by addressing the common mistake of setting the timer back to 10 minutes and explaining why it should be 6 minutes instead.
Conclusion
In summary, the right-hand sign is a shining example of how to communicate effectively and respectfully with your team. By providing context, clear instructions, and maintaining a respectful tone, we not only ensure that tasks are performed correctly but also build a culture of trust and engagement. Treating employees like adults who are capable of understanding and contributing to the improvement process is fundamental to achieving lasting success in any organization.
Published July 29, 2024, in Mark Graban’s blog.
Comments
Are you kidding me? Should…
Are you kidding me? Should we change stop signs to pink? What a ridiculous article! Why don't we just eliminate signs and let people decide what they want to do so we aren't being "authoritative" at all? Please, write about subjects that matter.
This is a good approach
This looks consistent with the job breakdown sheet, where the reason for each step of the job is provided.
For example, "Goggles must be worn" should be accompanied by the description of whatever hazard is present because it might not be obvious.
Add new comment