We’ve all seen “Cinderella processes,” those processes that, although they do all the work in the company, are underevaluated, almost ignored by auditors.
ADVERTISEMENT |
I recently conducted a survey on 20 auditors. It was intended to analyze what processes are emphasized in ISO/TS 16949 audits, as well as any nonconformances. The results were quite frustrating, considering that the ISO 9001-based quality management schemes were born during the late 1980s, some 25 years ago.
I included 20 auditors to have a reasonably representative sample, since I was reprimanded by one Quality Digest reader that one event is not significant enough. I wonder what he would think of one accident badly hurting his body; I personally consider even one event to be significant when it’s a system failure.
Let’s start with the Cinderella processes, then we’ll go through the nonconformances Hit Parade.
…
Comments
7.5.1.4
As an internal auditor I HAVE written a finding for 7.5.1.4 predictive maintenance. The division of my company that was registered to TS 16949 wasn't doing any! Their preventive maintance was excellent but predictive was nonexistant.
Add new comment