“For every person who will say yes, there are 20 who will say no. For a positive response, you must find the 21st person.”
—The Theory of 21
The CEO of an electronics company had an idea. He was a solid businessperson but was not as well-versed in electronics as some of his engineers. He came up with a new product idea but didn’t know if it was feasible. He asked two engineers to explore how it could be done so he could decide whether the idea was worth developing into a new product line.
ADVERTISEMENT |
One engineer made an appointment, and delivered a formal presentation to the CEO explaining why the idea would not work. He had color charts and graphs and even some data that suggested no one would want the product even if it were to make it to market.
When he finished, the CEO told him that the other engineer was in the process of implementing the idea. Instead of developing a knock-your-socks-off presentation explaining why the idea was a bad one, the other engineer had waded through the obstacles to find a way to make it happen.
The idea, by the way, was caller ID—that now-ubiquitous service on most phones.
…
Comments
"Theory of 21," or natural laws of emotional intelligence?
The story is interesting and entertaining, but the "theory" is misleading. What separates these people can be understood with training in emotional and behavioral intelligence, a well researched area of behavioral science. Many good books have been written on the subject, such as "Primal Leadership," by Daniel Goleman. We've published on the subject as well, including "The Missing Ingredient in Improvement Capability," appearing last year in Becker's Hospital Review. (link below) "EQ" is essential for anyone with a commitment to leadership development.
http://www.creative-healthcare.com/pdf/The-Missing-Link-in-Improvement-…
Add new comment