One of my favorite sayings is, “Nothing changes if nothing changes.” The reverse is also true: If nothing changes, nothing changes. Perfect! So I was more than a little surprised recently when I visited a company that had made a sizeable investment in bringing continuous improvement into the organization. The surprise was not the decision to do so; my surprise was that there was so little result after more than a year.
Senior leaders had brought in a first-rate training system as the core resource. Company coaches had gone through the train-the-trainer process. Everyone was geared up, psyched up, and raring to go. And they went! But a year later there was no noticeable change. Hardly a trace. The dial had not moved. The vice president of operations asked me to investigate. I reviewed the materials—splendid training content, solid logic, well-presented adult learning. Excellent trainers with strong coaching, personal, and teaching skills... plus outstanding management commitment. What had gone wrong?
Then I turned my attention to the company’s implementation calendar. I wanted to check the pacing of the learn-and-do sequence. What kind of time had been provided for participants to apply what they learned in the classroom? I got my answer: none. There was no such calendar. There was a training calendar only. Huh?
…
Comments
Nice Article!
The message people usually perceive after training: "OK, now you have had some training. Now get back to work." As a result, nothing happens, as noted in your article.
Leadership has to show that they EXPECT people to utilize their new skills which the company paid for. This might even require that the leadership themselves get the training as well! Imagine that!!!!
I once taught a class in SPC at a paper mill where I worked. Nothing changed until the mill manager started asking questions like: "Is your process in statistical control? How do you know?", etc.
Truth
In my experience, this is more the rule than the exception. Another issue that, to me, seems to be equally pervasive, is management does not participate in the training. Aside from demonstrating "Management Buy-In", they are more likely to recognize results, or lack thereof, at a very early stage.
Add new comment