{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Tilted CT Improves X-ray Inspection of Flat Components

Produces clearer images of samples of any shape in which dense areas mask less dense areas

Tue, 09/12/2023 - 12:00
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

(Nikon Metrology: Brighton, MI) -- A pioneering X-ray computed laminography (CL) technique has been introduced by the Industrial Metrology business unit of Nikon for nondestructively inspecting challenging components using the computed tomography (CT) systems it manufactures. The newly available method, called tilted CT, greatly improves voxel resolution when examining flat, high-aspect-ratio components. It also enhances quality control by producing clearer images of samples of any shape in which dense areas can mask those that are less dense.

ADVERTISEMENT

When scanning flat components that may have a small area of interest in the center that needs to be inspected, conventional 3D CT has limitations in terms of resolution because the axis of rotation of the item under investigation is at 90 degrees to the X-ray beam. It isn’t feasible to position the component closer to the source to increase the magnification of the area of interest and improve resolution because the sample as it turns would collide with the source.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us