Not too long ago, when you wanted a product to be leak-proof, you simply put it under water, made sure it didn’t bubble, and thereby concluded there were no leaks. Such “bubble testing” takes time and depends on the operator’s ability, making it totally inappropriate for the modern production environment. Also, it doesn’t generate the quantitative measurements that are the lifeblood of quality assurance engineering.
ADVERTISEMENT |
Dry-air leak testing methods—some of which can detect leaks as small as 0.01 standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm)—are the methods most commonly used today by a wide range of industries—from medical devices, to automotive, to appliances, and aerospace, among others. These dry air methods enable quality managers to define leaks quantitatively. “No leaks allowed” standards are concepts of the past.
…
Comments
leak testing 101
In a furture article please discuss how to test for leaks on a FFS blister/backer card configuration.
Additional Topics
Thak you for your request.
I will cover this topic and related "packaging" oriented subjects at a later date.
Dynamic/static and low/high pressure automated leak testing
Would it be possible to cover how to automatically count drops from units during hydraulic "proof" test with moving parts (i.e. one drop allowed per 25 cycles of an actuator)
Thanks!
Add new comment