In production, “zero defects” is a frequent quality metric, but zero worker injuries, while a stated goal of most manufacturing plants and distribution centers, has not made it to the gold standard. There is no disputing that defective product costs companies millions of dollars in repairs, reshipments, and bad customer relations. Ironically though, cost containment through fewer workers’ compensation claims, litigation, absenteeism, and employer reputation has a more significant impact on the bottom line than all other quality initiatives combined.
ADVERTISEMENT |
All employers will agree in principle that workforce health and safety is paramount and affects quality. Yet the documented physical labor processes in most companies continue to reveal that that repetitive lifting, lowering, and moving injuries cost businesses millions of dollars each year. Automating those tasks significantly reduces the potential for injuries and downtime. No approach has been found for totally eliminating back injuries caused by lifting, though effective safety control programs and ergonomic design of work tasks can be greatly improved.
…
Comments
Zero Accidents
Mr. Cutler,
Thank you for your interesting article on Safety and Quality. I just would like to make an addition that may provide additional knowledge to the readers of your fine article.
You state that, "In production, “zero defects” is a frequent quality metric, but zero worker injuries, while a stated goal of most manufacturing plants and distribution centers, has not made it to the gold standard.” On this subject Dr W. Edwards Deming stated that, “No system, whatever be the effort put into it, be it manufacturing, maintenance, operation, or service, will be free of accidents.” That was probably the main reason for his rejection of the concept of "zero defects" or "zero accidents."
Regards,
Fernando J. Grijalva
Add new comment