ADVERTISEMENT |
Honestly, the last bit of formal and substantive math that I worked with was back in college. Many, many years ago, I received a B.S. in mathematics, but other than the diploma, there is little physical—or intellectual!—evidence that would support this reality.
ADVERTISEMENT |
My former classmates might say the same was true way back when. My kids? Well, they used to hesitate before asking me to help them with their math homework. Which is exactly why I associate with really smart folks like my Lean Math blog co-founders Larry Loucka and Michael O’Connor (“Dr. Mike,” as he is called, has a Ph.D. in physics).
In any event, it’s tough to write about math without using mathematical symbols and notation. I know, you’re probably on the edge of your seat right about now. This is going to get really, really exciting, right?
…
Comments
Thank you for the chart
Hello Mark:
Thank you for the chart.
Please will you expalin the following?
└ 2.7 + 0.5 ┘ = 3
└ 2.2 + 0.5 ┘ = 2
I don't understand why 2.2 + 0.5 rounds down to 2.
Also, the example equation with the brackets doesn't seem to be impact by the answer. The equation with or without the brackets equals 35. Do you have any other examles to describe the difference between paranthesis and brackets?
Thank you, Dirk
Maths: a Lobby
Why is that, that Maths are so a heavy dish to digest for the majority of people? Isn't it because Maths pros' are afraid to exit their ivory tower, walk to the ground floor and meet laymen? I've always been good at Maths, thank to my teachers - who, may be not random case, came from Sicily, that is, a Greek colony. They were "teachers", before being "maths". Thank you.
Heavy Dish
Chart
Add new comment