Editor’s note: This is the second article of a multipart series about the role of quality in education and its effect on workforce development. In part one of the series, the role of accountability was detailed and profiled.
The well-established quality control mechanisms and processes used in business for more than two decades are now infiltrating academia. Rather than quality control professionals, accountability directors are assuming the functions of ensuring best practices in schools. Where business refers to continuous process improvement, the education model refers to monitoring.
ADVERTISEMENT |
Based on the voluminous mandates and initiatives from local school districts and state and federal governments as required by No Child Left Behind, schools are attempting to quickly respond with strategies that will improve students’ achievement test scores as well as skill sets in reading and math. Just as industry selects a process strategy, such as lean Six Sigma, education models use similar methods to select and assess the efficacy of their solutions.
…
Comments
Metrics in education
All the professional educators I know describe "no child left behind" as a fraud. All claim that for their survival, teachers must teach the tests. That leaves no time for critical thinking and other skills necessary for a true education. I am teaching in a masters program at a prestegious university and find that my students have passed all the secondary school tests, only to come to me unable to construct a proper sentence.
Add new comment