Often a firm is confronted with the key question of whether the quality of its products and services should be improved. For many readers, the question may even seem illogical: How could it not be beneficial for a firm to improve the quality of its products and services?
On closer analysis, however, the question has deep strategic implications because ultimately, a firm’s market structure and competition influence its choice of quality. Incurring additional costs to provide a level of quality that is neither valued by consumers nor provides sufficient differentiation from the competition may be unwise in the long run.
ADVERTISEMENT |
The purpose of strategy is to create a deliberate plan of action that creates a competitive advantage for a firm. The firm that achieves the highest rates of profitability in its industry is the one that has attained a competitive advantage over rivals.
…
Comments
Quality Level
Congratulations & thanks, Stewart. I claim the same in terms of quality philosophy and economics but I am grateful for your operationalization of this thesis through specific indicators which are visualized in a simple and effective graph.
Julian
Is that quality?
The statement " Incurring additional costs to provide a level of quality that is neither valued by consumers nor provides sufficient differentiation from the competition may be unwise in the long run" brings me to the question that if something is not valued by the customer can we call that quality? For me quality is always customer related.
Add new comment